Tag: writing
-
December 23rd, 2012 10:56am
-
December 16th, 2012 9:55pm
And this is why you never trust a word processor…
-
December 11th, 2012 5:06am
What I try to teach young actors – the best thing they can learn is to identify well-written material. The writing in our industry, in a story, is the most important element, bar none. It is always about the writing first.
So what I’ve been able to do – the thing I’m good at, really, is to identify well written material. Now that doesn’t mean the product is going to end up that way. It’s a recipe – and sometimes it doesn’t work – and you’re thinking, ‘oh well, wait a minute, I had all the ingredients, how did this happen?’ That’s going to happen.
But if you start with something that has good writing, you at least have a shot. If you start with something that is not well written, you have no shot of making something good. The best actor in the world can make “C” level material “C+” level material. Maybe “B-”, that’s it.
— Bryan Cranston
-
December 10th, 2012 1:30am
capacity replied to your post: Just finished editing my final essay for my…
post ittttFor some reason I lost half the formatting when I did the copy/paste, but hurrr.Comic Books: Harmful or Helpful?
[[MORE]]
When you think of comic books, the first thing that probably pops into your mind is a flamboyantly dressed hero with exaggerated words like BAM or POW hovering over their head. Unfortunately, this generalization is the extent of what most people know about comic books, and has led to the idea that comics are nothing but picture books for children. However, that notion is simply not true. Comic books have a rich history of being ground breaking, educational and, of course, fun. Even still, the opinion of comics has remained negative and generalized, preventing the medium from remaining widely exposed and available.
One of the contributing factors to the stigma surrounding comic books has been the lasting impressions of early critics. In 1940, Sterling North, a reviewer for the Chicago Daily News, described comic books as, “badly drawn, badly written, and badly printed – a strain on the young eyes and young nervous systems” (Coville). This caused companies like DC Comics, who was the largest comic publisher at the time, to put together editorial boards to show citizens that comic books were being held up to standards of wholesome entertainment. These boards were formed with psychiatrists, child welfare experts, and some famous, well respected citizens. The board members’ names were printed on the inside cover of all DC books, an action that did help to relieve some of the criticism that comic books had come under, but not for long. In 1948, well respected psychiatrist, Dr. Fredric Werthham, publicly attacked comic books in an interview with Collier’s Magazine. Dr. Werthham conducted a seven-year study of the effects that comic books had on children. The study reported that the portrayal of sex and violence in comic books encouraged similar behavior in children. In the interview, Werthham stated that, “The number of `good’ comics is not worth discussing, but the great number that masquerade as `good’ certainly deserve close scrutiny” (Coville). Several weeks after the interview, Dr. Werthham hosted a seminar in New York City called “The Psychopathology of Comic Books”, where he discussed the details of his seven year study and was able to convince many key individuals of the maliciousness that comic books held. One of the individuals that attended Dr. Werthham’s seminar was Detroit Police Commissioner Harry S. Toy, who in an interview with Time Magazine the following month claimed that upon inspection of every comic book available in his community, he found they were all, “Loaded with communist teachings, sex, and racial discrimination” (Coville). The statements and testimonies from individuals like Dr. Werthham and Commissioner Toy led to an extreme sway in public opinion which resulted in the mass burning of comic books in New York City on December 20th, 1948. Time Magazine covered the mass burning and printed pictures of Binghamton, New York residents, after a house to house collection burning comic books in the streets.
This stigma still holds strong today, with many thinking that comic books are both written and drawn by second rate artists, which couldn’t be further from the truth. Many comic book writers like Neil Gaiman, Brad Meltzer, and Geoff Johns have gone on to write bestselling novels, while artists like Alex Ross, Adam Hughes, and Jock have worked in both the film and video game industries.
For nearly seventy years the American comic book industry has struggled to maintain the public’s interest, trying desperately to reinvent characters and stories almost every generation, hoping to spark a new line of readers. This constant cycle of reinvention didn’t produce any success and by the 1980’s companies within the industry were looking for new approaches. In 1986 everything changed, DC Comics published a mini-series titled Watchmen by writer Alan Moore and artist David Gibbons, which featured a rag-tag group of six vigilantes (only one of which had any superhuman abilities) who battled their own inner demons and conflicted with each other, rather than doing battle with some extraordinary foe (DC). The book was so rich in character development, political undertones, and social commentary that it became an instant success and is now heralded as the greatest comic book of all time.
Watchmen set the tone for today’s comic books, focusing on the humanization of superheroes and incorporating political and social ideas, something that had been done too often in comic books up to this point. Yet, even with the all of the acclaim that Watchmen has received there are still many who refuse to believe that comic books can hold their own in the realm of literary worth. This rejection of comic books is quite interesting because from 1940 to 1971 an educational comic titled Classics Illustrated was printed; its purpose was to produce comic book adaptations of classic children’s literature in stylized and exciting ways. The series was so popular during its original run that its publisher often had to issue reprinting’s and was supported by many big name publishers like Doubleday and Penguin Books (Tambone).
Even today, educational comic books continue to be printed and used as learning materials for young children. Books like Scary, Gross, and Enlightening Books for Boys Grades 3-12, by Deborah Ford, utilize the page layout of traditional comic books to capture children’s attention and hold their interest in subjects like science and history. Ford’s belief is that, “Whether that book is a novel–or a graphic novel–there’s still a narrative, words on a page, and literacy involved” (Barack). As it turns out, despite what critics may say or believe, Ford’s claim is backed by research that proves that the comic book narrative is a better delivery system for information to children than traditional textbooks. In 2004, the psychology department of the University of Bath published an article in the science and philosophy journal, Endeavor, summarizing that in their research they found that, “Narratives are indeed an alternative and an important means for science communication to convey information in an accurate, attractive, imaginative and memorable way. To present scientific information through stories, novels, comics and plays should be regarded as an important means to transmit information in the repertoire of both science teachers and science communicators” (Negrete).
So, despite book burnings of the past, I think it is safe to say that comic books are more than just poorly constructed magazines targeted to waste children’s time and parent’s money. They hold stories crafted by some of the best storytellers, masterful art, and can be invaluable tools when it comes to teaching children about subjects ranging from morality to science. As author Peter David stated in his book, Writing for Comics, “Comic books are the equivalent of modern day myth building. Heck, a lot of comics even contain actual mythical characters. We should hold the texts of Superman soaring through the air, and Batman creeping through the night just as sacred as our ancestors held Zeus” (49). Comic books and their characters have become an intricate part of American culture and continue to awe and inspire us with their combination of otherworldly and down to Earth tales.
-
December 10th, 2012 1:15am
Just finished editing my final essay for my writing class. Turned out a lot better than I expected, I’m almost proud of it.
-
December 7th, 2012 11:56pm
The process of writing a chapter for me is no different from writing any other song; except if I get caught up in a rhyme, with “Trapped in the Closet,” I usually have to go find some clothes to bring that character out of me. Say, for instance, if I get stuck on what Pimp Lucious is gonna say, what his actions are gonna be, I would usually go and get a tight suit and some tacky clothes and put a wig on and get some glasses and a cane, and walk around the studio until I feel like I am Pimp Lucious. Once I put the clothes on and get all up into character, the thing that he’s supposed to say usually comes to me, and I can proceed along with the process.—R. Kelly, on writing. (via twiststreet)
yeah, this is pretty much my approach to writing as well
(via marksable)
-
December 6th, 2012 9:33pm
“Police want to question him about the fatal shooting of Gregory Viant Faull, who was shot to death in early November on the Belize island where both men lived.”
Shot to death in a fatal shooting? Are you serious? You’re writing an article for Yahoo and you write like that?
“McAfee went on the run last month after officials tried to question him about the killing of Faull, who was shot to death in early November.”
You already said that…
-
December 4th, 2012 12:48pm
You really shouldn’t be in a graduate class if you consistently switch verb tenses.
This. Is. Not. Hard.
